|
| |
Efficacy of Application of
the Adeli Suit ...
Figure 03
|
A
|
|
Open eyes |
Close
eyes |
Ratio *
|
|
Initial deviation by x
|
x
|
-20.35
|
3.36
|
23.71
|
|
Initial deviation by y
|
y
|
12.78
|
19.98
|
7.21
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation by x
|
Ax
|
22.54
|
23.87
|
1.06
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation by
y
|
Ay
|
19.56
|
24.44
|
1.25
|
|
The length of curve
|
LI
|
1,672
|
3,287
|
1.97
|
|
The area
|
TA
|
16,312
|
30,911
|
1.90
|
|
Mean radius of deviation
|
R
|
27.22
|
30.13
|
1.11
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation
|
RMS
|
29.84
|
34.16
|
1.14
|
|
Porosity index by x
|
Ix
|
37.26
|
57.67
|
1.55
|
|
Porosity index by y
|
Iy
|
61.55
|
134.42
|
2.18
|
|
Total porosity index
|
I
|
71.95
|
146.27
|
2.03
|
|
Evaluation of movement
|
OF
|
61.43
|
109.10
|
1.78
|
|
* Difference is calculated for x and y
|
|
|
Fig.
3a. Parameters of stabilography
(A),
statokinesigram in standing position with visual control
(B),
and without it
(C)
in Peter
Z., 16, with the hyper-kinetic form of ICP before the start of treatment
with application of Adeli Suit. |
|
A
|
|
Open eyes |
Close
eyes |
Ratio *
|
|
Initial deviation by x
|
x
|
-5.99
|
-6.78
|
-0.80
|
|
Initial deviation by y
|
y
|
-1.98
|
-3.27
|
-1.29
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation by x
|
Ax
|
5.28
|
6.47
|
1.23
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation by
y
|
Ay
|
6.60
|
7.15
|
1.08
|
|
The length of curve
|
LI
|
658.89
|
1,112
|
1.69
|
|
The area
|
TA
|
1,674.03
|
3,171
|
1.89
|
|
Mean radius of deviation
|
R
|
7.23
|
8.40
|
1.16
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation
|
RMS
|
8.45
|
9.64
|
1.14
|
|
Porosity index by x
|
Ix
|
11.99
|
21.95
|
1.83
|
|
Porosity index by y
|
Iy
|
23.54
|
40.99
|
1.74
|
|
Total porosity index
|
I
|
26.41
|
46.50
|
1.76
|
|
Evaluation of movement
|
OF
|
91.16
|
132.47
|
1.45
|
|
* Difference is calculated for x and y
|
|
|
Fig.
3b. Parameters of stabilography
(A),
statokinesigram in standing position with visual control
(B),
and without it
(C)
in Peter Z., 16, with the hyper-kinetic form of ICP after the
end of the fourth session of treatment with application of Adeli Suit. |
|
