|
| |
Efficacy of Application of
the Adeli Suit ...
Figure 02
|
A
|
|
Open eyes |
Close
eyes |
Ratio *
|
|
Initial deviation by x
|
x
|
2.23
|
-10.52
|
-12.75
|
|
Initial deviation by y
|
y
|
-1.90
|
0.75
|
2.65
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation by x
|
Ax
|
7.11
|
4.61
|
0.65
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation by
y
|
Ay
|
6.76
|
4.93
|
0.73
|
|
The length of curve
|
LI
|
592.24
|
292.05
|
0.49
|
|
The area
|
TA
|
1,733.29
|
493.99
|
0.29
|
|
Mean radius of deviation
|
R
|
8.39
|
5.85
|
0.70
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation
|
RMS
|
9.82
|
6.75
|
0.69
|
|
Porosity index by x
|
Ix
|
16.38
|
7.42
|
0.45
|
|
Porosity index by y
|
Iy
|
16.14
|
7.74
|
0.48
|
|
Total porosity index
|
I
|
23.00
|
10.72
|
0.47
|
|
Evaluation of movement
|
OF
|
70.58
|
49.93
|
0.71
|
|
* Difference is calculated for x and y
|
|
|
Fig.
2a. Parameters of stabilography
(A),
statokinesigram in standing position with visual control
(B),
and without it
(C)
in
Alexandra Sh., 6, with the spastic form of ICP before the start of treatment
with application of Adeli Suit. |
|
A
|
|
Open eyes |
Close
eyes |
Ratio *
|
|
Initial deviation by x
|
x
|
-0.70
|
-1.44
|
-0.74
|
|
Initial deviation by y
|
y
|
5.52
|
1.59
|
-3.93
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation by x
|
Ax
|
3.23
|
1.86
|
0.58
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation by
y
|
Ay
|
1.37
|
2.24
|
1.64
|
|
The length of curve
|
LI
|
250.28
|
122.55
|
0.49
|
|
The area
|
TA
|
174.76
|
148.94
|
0.85
|
|
Mean radius of deviation
|
R
|
2.80
|
2.41
|
0.86
|
|
Mean quadratic deviation
|
RMS
|
3.51
|
2.91
|
0,83
|
|
Porosity index by x
|
Ix
|
9.23
|
3.17
|
0.34
|
|
Porosity index by y
|
Iy
|
3.15
|
3.10
|
0.98
|
|
Total porosity index
|
I
|
9.75
|
4.44
|
0.46
|
|
Evaluation of movement
|
OF
|
89.36
|
50.91
|
0.57
|
|
* Difference is calculated for x and y
|
|
|
Fig. 2b.
Parameters of stabilography (A),
statokinesigram in standing position with visual control (B),
and without it (C) in Alexandra Sh., 6,
with the spastic form of ICP after the end of the second session of
treatment with application of Adeli Suit. |
|
